Pediatric Pars Planitis: A Review.

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of pediatric pars planitis. METHODS: Narrative literature review. RESULTS: Pars planitis refers to the idiopathic subset of intermediate uveitis in which there is vitritis along with snowball or snowbank formation occurring in the absence of an associated infection or systemic disease. It is thought to be a T-cell mediated disease with a genetic predisposition. Pars planitis accounts for 5-26.7% of pediatric uveitis cases. Presentation is commonly bilateral but asymmetric, often with insidious onset of floaters and blurred vision. Although pars planitis is known to be a benign form of uveitis in most cases, severe complications secondary to chronic inflammation may arise, with cystoid macular edema being the most common cause of visual morbidity. Mild vitritis in the absence of symptoms, vision loss, or macular edema may be observed. Patients with severe vitritis and/or associated vision-threatening complications require prompt aggressive treatment. A stepladder approach including corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, anti­tumor necrosis factor­alpha and pars plana vitrectomy and/or laser photocoagulation is the most commonly used method for treatment of pars planitis. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of pediatric pars planitis and associated complications are crucial in order to improve visual outcomes.

Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by urinary tract infection: A case report.

RATIONALE: Endogenous endophthalmitis is a vision-threatening intraocular infection caused by hematogenous spread of infectious organisms from distant sites. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 71-year-old man with a history of fever and dysuria 5 days prior to presentation presented with sudden loss of vision in his left eye. The patient had no history of ocular surgery or trauma, and ocular examination revealed a large amount of exudative plaque covering the pupil. Therefore, fundus examination was not feasible. B-scan ultrasonography revealed a dome-shaped subretinal mass with an exudative retinal detachment. DIAGNOSIS: Endogenous endophthalmitis was diagnosed on the basis of these findings. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy and the early postoperative course was favorable. OUTCOMES: Vitreous cultures grew gram-negative bacilli, identified as Klebsiella pneumonia. Urinalysis revealed white blood cells (++) and urinary tract infection was the only identifiable risk factor for endogenous endophthalmitis. LESSONS: Urinary tract infection is an independent risk factor for endogenous endophthalmitis.

EFFICACY OF VITRECTOMY COMBINED WITH INTRAVITREAL ANTIBIOTICS FOR SEVERE POST-TRAUMATIC ENDOPHTHALMITIS.

PURPOSE: To explore clinical efficacy of vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antibiotics in treating severe endophthalmitis after open-globe trauma in patients. METHODS: The records of all patients who received vitrectomy combined with intravitreal for the severe post-traumatic endophthalmitis with light perception or worse between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antibiotics, repeated intravitreal antibiotics with or without vitreous aspiration, and retinal repair after the infection was controlled. Efficacy of severe post-traumatic endophthalmitis was analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients (121 eyes) were included in this study. The mean BCVA improved from 4.03 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution to 1.75 ± 1.41 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ( P < 0.001) at the end of the follow-up period, which increased in 106 eyes (87.60%). Infection was successfully controlled in all eyes, 88 eyes within two operations. Pathogens including streptococci (odds ratio [OR] = 6.68, P < 0.001), fungi (OR = 15.23, P < 0.001), and mixed infection (OR = 6.67, P < 0.05) were related to the number of operations. Finally, 60 eyes (49.59%) received silicone oil filling, 25 received gas tamponade, and the remaining 36 received no tamponade; complete vitrectomy was performed in all eyes with intraocular tamponade. All eyes for gas tamponade and no tamponade had been remained stable without retinal detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy after 6-month follow-up. The rate of recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil tamponade was 4.96% (six eyes), including 1.65% (two eyes) of proliferative vitreoretinopathy; these eyes underwent reoperation of retinal detachment repair. CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antibiotics may be an effective treatment option for severe post-traumatic endophthalmitis.

Double-flanged polypropylene technique: 5-year results.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term (5-year) results and complications of the double-flanged polypropylene technique in patients with capsular tension segment fixation, nonfoldable intraocular lens (IOL) scleral fixation, and foldable IOL scleral fixation. SETTING: Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte and Centro Oftalmológico de Minas Gerais. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Eyes that underwent treatment using the double-flanged polypropylene technique between September 2016 to September 2021 were included. LogMAR visual acuity was recorded, as well as complications such as long-term polypropylene resistance, conjunctival erosion, conjunctival inflammation, flange exposure, internalization, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and cystoid macular edema. RESULTS: 71 eyes of 61 patients were evaluated. The mean follow-up period for these eyes was 28.2 ± 14.3 (min: 4; max: 60; median: 26) months. 173 flanges were performed. 13 cases with sub-Tenon flanges (7.5%) were observed. 5 exposed flanges (2.89%), presented after a mean of 1.8 weeks postoperatively, were observed. 1 patient with large flanges presented with conjunctival inflammation and hyperemia. 2 late internalized flanges (1.1%) and 2 recently internalized flanges (1.1%) were observed. 3 eyes (4.22%) had retinal detachment. Moreover, cystoid macular edema was detected in 3 eyes (4.22%). No cases of endophthalmitis were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The double-flanged technique was proven to be stable when the correct technical procedure was followed. However, complications can be observed, especially with short scleral tunnels and in eyes where the flanges were not buried inside the sclera.

OUTCOMES OF RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR FOLLOWING INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of and identify risk factors for redetachment in eyes that underwent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair after infectious endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients who had RRD surgery following a diagnosis of endophthalmitis from 2008 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as operative details were collected. Subjects with prior RRD, trauma, keratoprosthesis, or less than 3 months of postoperative follow-up were excluded. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes of 34 patients were included. Most subjects were male with a mean age of 60.1 years. Exogenous (58.8%) was more common than endogenous (41.2%) sources of endophthalmitis. Seventeen of 34 eyes (50.0%) experienced redetachment. Significant risk factors were infection with virulent organisms, hypotony, and postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Initial management with vitreous tap or vitrectomy, exogenous versus endogenous source, and surgical procedure were not associated with recurrent RRD. At the final follow-up, 32 of 34 eyes (91.2%) were attached, although more than one third of these had silicone oil. CONCLUSION: Redetachment occurred in half of eyes that underwent surgical repair of RRD after endophthalmitis. Early vitrectomy, with or without prior vitreous tap, was not associated with a higher risk of redetachment and improved the likelihood of a positive culture result. Culture data can aid in risk stratification because organism virulence was a risk factor for recurrent RRD. Although visual outcomes were generally poor, most retinas remained attached at the final visit.

IMMEDIATE VITRECTOMY vs TAP AND INJECT IN EYES WITH ACUTE POSTCATARACT ENDOPHTHALMITIS AND VISUAL ACUITY ≥HM: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of immediate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and tap and inject in eyes with postcataract surgery endophthalmitis. METHODS: Patients presenting with acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis and visual acuity between ≥ hand movement and <6/18 were randomized to receive either PPV (Group A) or tap and inject (Group B). RESULTS: There were 26 and 31 eyes in Group A and Group B, respectively. The final mean visual acuity at 6 weeks [0.14 (Snellen equivalent 6/7.5) versus 0.22 (Snellen equivalent 6/9.5) LogMAR in Groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.2] was similar. However, eyes in Group A had significantly greater mean letter gain in vision compared with Group B (66.36 vs. 43.36, P = 0.02), and more eyes in Group A (88%) than in Group B (65%) attained a visual acuity of ≥ 6/18 ( P = 0.06). Eyes in Group B needed more reinterventions including delayed vitrectomy after tap and inject than those in Group A (39% vs. 8%; P = 0.09). On subgroup analysis, the mean visual acuity at the final follow-up was significantly better in the immediate PPV group compared with the delayed PPV group ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: PPV resulted in earlier recovery, lesser interventions, and greater change in visual acuity than tap and inject in eyes with postcataract surgery endophthalmitis presenting with visual acuity of ≥HM.

Refractory Choledocholithiasis Causing Endogenous Endophthalmitis: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis is caused by a breach of the blood-ocular barrier by pathogens originating from distant infective foci. Here, we report a case of endogenous endophthalmitis due to cholangitis complicated by common bile duct stones, which is a rare source of infection. CASE REPORT A 73-year-old man with type II diabetes mellitus underwent endoscopic choledocholithotripsy 20 years ago and laparoscopic cholecystectomy 18 years ago. He had choledocholith-related cholangitis 6, 5, and 1 years previously and 4 times in the last year and underwent endoscopic choledocholithotripsy each time. Three days after the last surgery, the patient developed right endogenous endophthalmitis and vitrectomy was performed. Four months later, the patient relapsed with cholangitis and required surgery for recurrent endophthalmitis. Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy was performed with curative intent, and the patient was followed up for 5 years without recurrence of choledocholith, cholangitis, or endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS The recommended treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones or choledocholithiasis is stone extraction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic intervention is a widely accepted procedure. However, in cases of recurrent choledocholithiasis, the rate of recurrence increases and the interval between ERCP becomes shorter in proportion to the number of recurrences. In such intractable cases requiring numerous sessions of endoscopic stone removal, bypass Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy should be performed to prevent possible rare complications such as endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis.

27-GAUGE PARS PLANA/PLICATA VITRECTOMY FOR PEDIATRIC VITREORETINAL SURGERY.

PURPOSE: To report on the feasibility of 27-gauge (G) vitrectomy for pediatric patients. METHODS: This study is an international, multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series. Participants were patients 17 years or younger who underwent 27-G vitrectomy for various indications. RESULTS: The records of 56 eyes from 47 patients were reviewed. Mean age was 5.7 ± 5.2 years. Diagnoses included retinopathy of prematurity (Stages 3 with vitreous hemorrhage, 4A, 4B, and 5), Terson's syndrome, traumatic macular hole, posterior capsular opacification, endophthalmitis, and others. Instruments used were the 27-G infusion, 27-G vitreous cutter, 27-G light pipe, and 27-G internal limiting membrane forceps. Instrument bending was noted in one (1.8%) case. There were no cases with intraoperative complications, infusion issues, or postoperative endophthalmitis. There were 67/145 (46%) sclerotomies that required suturing, of which most (51/145) were sutured out of precaution. There were four cases (7.1%) that required conversion to a larger gauge and three cases (5.3%) that developed postoperative hypotony. Mean visual acuity improved from logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 1.32 (20/420) to 0.72 (20/105), after a mean follow-up of 125.1 days (P = 0.01). Anatomic success was achieved in 96.4% of eyes after a single surgery. CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy was safe and feasible in selected pediatric vitreoretinopathies. Further studies are warranted to examine indications and outcomes.

Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis at an academic institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis at Wilmer Eye Institute from 2010 to 2019 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, cause for endophthalmitis, microbial culture results, salvaging procedures and surgical intervention were recorded. In patients who underwent enucleation or evisceration, type of surgery and placement of a primary implant were recorded. Chi-squared, Student's t-tests and multivariate analysis were used to identify clinical factors that predicted enucleation or evisceration. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty three patients treated for endophthalmitis over the study period were identified, of which 25 (9.88%) underwent enucleation or evisceration. Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration included poor presenting visual acuity (OR 7.86, CI: 2.26, 27.3), high presenting intraocular pressure (OR 1.07, CI: 1.03, 1.12), presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (OR 3.69, CI: 1.20, 11.37) and positive vitreous culture for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (OR 18.3, CI: 1.54, 219.2) on multivariate analysis. Patients undergoing enucleation or evisceration were also more likely to have trauma, corneal ulcer or combined causes for endophthalmitis and underwent fewer salvaging surgical and procedural interventions. There were no significant differences in characteristics of those receiving enucleation versus evisceration in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with endophthalmitis who underwent enucleation or evisceration had more severe disease on presentation compared to those treated with eye sparing therapy. Presenting clinical characteristics may have a role in triage and management decisions for patients presenting with severe endophthalmitis.

Pars plana vitrectomy and therapeutic keratoplasty in endophthalmitis and infectious keratitis.

PURPOSE: To describe the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with infectious keratitis (IK) and secondary endophthalmitis who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) assisted by temporary keratoprosthesis (TKP). METHODS: An observational retrospective case series was performed. Data were collected from January 2013 to July 2020. Patients over 18 years old with a clinical and microbiological diagnosis of IK, and clinical, ultrasonographic, and or microbiological diagnosis of endophthalmitis were included. Anatomical success was defined as infection resolution with preservation of the ocular globe integrity. No change or improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (VA) at the last follow-up was considered as a functional success. RESULTS: A total of 32 eyes of 32 patients were analyzed. The anatomic success was obtained in 87.5% eyes in which the infection was eradicated. The 63% patients maintained or improved their best-corrected VA, 37.5% ended up with hand motion VA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PPV assisted by TKP followed by PKP can be a good approach for treating patients with endophthalmitis secondary to IK while allowing further visual improvement after an optical PK. Further prospective studies need to be done to evaluate final visual rehabilitation of these patients.

Surgical outcomes of orbital evisceration with primary orbital implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the surgical outcomes of evisceration with primary orbital implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis and analyses the association with implant exposure and extrusion. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre, Chinese cohort study. Review of medical records and orbital images of patients who underwent evisceration with primary orbital implant placement between January 2005 and January 2021. RESULTS: Out of 79 patients who underwent orbital evisceration with primary orbital implant placement, 26 (26 eyes) of them (male = 13) suffered from endophthalmitis. The duration from endophthalmitis diagnosis (19 = exogenous, 7 = endogenous) to evisceration was 9 standard deviation ± 5 (range: 1-15) days. The follow-up was 70 ± 46 (24-180) months after operation. The orbital implant size was 17 ± 3 (14-20) mm, and silicone was the most used material (69%, 18/26 of patients). The most frequent post-operative complication was orbital implant exposure (42%, 11/26), followed by orbital implant extrusion (12% 3/26) and ptosis (8%, 2/26). Implant exposure or extrusion was more commonly associated with endophthalmitis in comparison to non-endophthalmitis patients that required evisceration and primary orbital implant placement (54% versus 17%, P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed single scleral closure technique (100% versus 58%, P < 0.05) and endogenous endophthalmitis (50% versus 0%, P < 0.05) were associated with implant exposure or extrusion, and only endogenous endophthalmitis was significant with multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary implant placement during evisceration should be avoided in eyes with endophthalmitis especially in those with an endogenous source, and double scleral closure technique may be a better alternative for primary orbital implant placement in infected eyes.

Primary vitrectomy or intravitreal antibiotics followed by early vitrectomy for acute endophthalmitis: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare outcomes of acute endophthalmitis (EO) managed with either primary vitrectomy (PV) or primary intravitreal antibiotics (vancomycin and ceftazidime) followed by early vitrectomy (PIAEV) combined with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics. METHODS: This was a prospective, comparative observational study of acute EO cases admitted to a regional vitreoretinal service over 18 months. Depending on whether immediate vitrectomy (within 6 h) was achievable, the EO cases were treated with either (1) PV or (2) PIAEV. Microbiology samples were collected either (A) before or (B) after administration of intravitreal antibiotics. The samples were analysed with broad-range 16S PCR and culture. RESULTS: The study included 41 EO cases. There were 19 post-injection EO, 18 post-cataract EO, three post-vitrectomy EO, and one blebitis-related EO. Fifteen of 19 PV cases and 15 of 21 PIAEV had a clinically meaningful improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of at least 15 letters at 3 months (p = 0.58). One patient was lost to follow-up. Twenty-three cases were culture- and PCR-positive, and seven additional cases were culture-negative but PCR-positive (p = 0.02). PCR increased the diagnostic yield for samples collected both before and after administration of intravitreal antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Primary vitrectomy or PIAEV allowed for vitrectomy for all cases of acute EO in a large region. Most eyes in both groups achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in BCVA. By combining culture with PCR in connection with the vitrectomy procedure, intravitreal antibiotics could be injected before microbiological sampling, thereby improving the door-to-treatment time without sacrificing microbial identification.

Pars-plana-vitrectomy for endophthalmitis treatment and the role of standardized ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Endophthalmitis is a severe inflammation following surgery or endogenous spread of pathogens. Besides clinical signs and symptoms, standardized ultrasound might help to confirm the diagnosis. Thus, we analyzed 172 cases of endophthalmitis for pathogens, visual acuity (VA) and the predictive value of standardized ultrasound. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with pars-plana-vitrectomy for endophthalmitis at the University Eye Hospital was performed. Sex, age, VA at presentation, first day after surgery, four weeks postoperatively, and at last follow-up, as well as pathogen culture, and presence of standardized ultrasound before vitrectomy were recorded. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used for groupwise comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients (male = 47.7%) with a median age of 76 years (IQR 65-82 years) treated for endophthalmitis (exogenous = 85.5%) were included. Median follow-up time was 65 days (IQR 12-274 days). Visual acuity at presentation was 2.30 logMAR (IQR 2.70-2.30 logMAR); it increased to 1.00 logMAR (1.4-0.40 logMAR) at last follow-up. A total of 79 patients (45.9%) underwent standardized ultrasound before vitrectomy. Patients with positive ultrasound criteria had a significantly decreased VA at presentation (p = 0.034). Positive microbiological cultures for Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis were associated with decreased VA (p = 0.028) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Standardized ultrasound is an easy and robust tool in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis. Positive criteria are significantly associated with decreased VA at presentation. The recovery of VA depends on pathogens and is significantly worse for certain species (Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis).

Ultrasound-Guided Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a novel surgical technique that combines B-scan ultrasound with modern vitrectomy techniques. METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis, which were scheduled for pars plana vitrectomy and ruled out as candidates for transient keratoprosthesis, were enrolled. The ultrasound probe was placed over the eye to use the images to witness the vitreous movement around the cutter and to establish its position in relation to the retinal wall. The procedure was performed in at least four ultrasound projections (longitudinal-9,6, 3, and 12). All patients were followed for three months, and in each visit, the visual acuity and the presence of adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 12 patients (mean age: 56.2 ± 18.4 years) were enrolled. Visual acuity at baseline was 2.3 ± 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Sixty-six percent achieved inactivation of endophthalmitis. Two patients had evisceration caused by uncontrolled infection, and two more had retinal detachment during follow-up. Visual acuity at the end of follow-up was 2.1 ± 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ( P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided vitrectomy is a feasible surgical technique. More studies are needed to assess its safety profile and optimize outcomes.

Combined Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty and Pars Plana Vitrectomy for the Treatment of Infectious Keratitis Endophthalmitis: Mexican Endophthalmitis Study Group Protocol 4.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of combined surgical treatment of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy in the anatomical and functional outcome of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis. METHODS: This study reviewed the medical records of 4 participating centers in the United States and Mexico. This study included patients with a clinical diagnosis of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis who had been treated with an early therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy as the main treatment for endophthalmitis. From each medical record, the study retrieved demographic data, relevant medical and drug history, baseline clinical manifestation of endophthalmitis, best-corrected visual acuity, and the need for enucleation/evisceration for the control of the infection or any other reason through the follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 48 patients (50.15 ± 20.6 years). The mean follow-up time was 13 ± 0.5 months. The mean best-corrected visual acuity at baseline was 2.1 ± 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. At month 12 was 2.09 ± 0.61 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ( P = 0.9). The overall prevalence of enucleation/evisceration was 8.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.32%-19.98%). The prevalence of a vision of no-light perception was 20.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.32%-19.98%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined surgery for severe cases of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis eradicates the infection in most cases, while significantly improving the overall outcomes.

Single or double? A comparison of evisceration techniques.

PURPOSE: We compared the rates of implant exposure and extrusion after evisceration with single and double scleral closure techniques. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent evisceration with an implant insertion over the past 18 years at Tung Wah Eastern Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital. Clinical documents and operation records were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 81 ethnic Chinese patients (44 male) who underwent evisceration with primary implant insertion were reviewed. 39 (48%) patients underwent the double scleral closure technique with an implant placed posterior to the posterior sclera, and 42 (52%) patients underwent the single scleral closure technique with an implant inserted in the intra-scleral cavity. The follow-up interval was 70 months. The surgical indications were endophthalmitis (35%), painful blind eye (23%), traumatic disfigured globe (22%) and phthisis bulbi (20%). Silicone was the most used implant material (69%). The patients who underwent double scleral closure had a larger size of the implant (19.7 vs 17.9 mm, p < 0.05). Both implant exposure (26% vs 3%, p < 0.05) and implant extrusion (26% vs 0%, p < 0.05) were more common in patients who underwent single scleral. CONCLUSIONS: Double scleral closure technique allows a larger implant, and it is associated with a lower rate of implant exposure and extrusion. The double scleral closure technique is a superior technique of choice in these patients with primary implant placement.

Case Report: Poor Outcome Despite Aggressive Management in Pythium insidiosum Endophthalmitis.

Pythium insidiosum is a parasitic oomycete that can cause keratitis and closely resembles fungus, both clinically and morphologically. It requires a trained microbiologist for its differentiation from fungal filaments and has poor response to antifungal therapy. We present a case of primary isolation of the organism from the vitreous cavity in a case of endophthalmitis. The infection spread quickly and involved all the ocular tissues. The eye had poor visual outcome despite a sequence of rapidly completed retinal and corneal surgeries along with initiation of anti-Pythium therapy.

Silicone oil tamponade in managing recalcitrant endophthalmitis after cataract surgery secondary to Clostridium intestinale.

A woman presented two weeks after uncomplicated cataract surgery with decreased visual acuity from endophthalmitis. One week after initial management with intravitreal antibiotics, her visual acuity decreased further, undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal and intravenous antimicrobial coverage with preliminary improvement. Three days after vitrectomy, her vision decreased with recurrent inflammation. Initial cultures grew Clostridium intestinale She underwent repeat vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade with no subsequent recurrence. The silicone oil was removed after 4 months and her visual acuity returned to 20/20 after 1 month and through 1 year of follow-up. Postoperative endophthalmitis is rare, with cases due to Clostridium species particularly destructive. In this first reported case of C. intestinale endophthalmitis, conventional management did not achieve lasting quiescence until silicone oil tamponade was employed. Pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade should be considered in the management of recurrent endophthalmitis or endophthalmitis secondary to a recalcitrant microbe.

Early vitrectomy for exogenous endophthalmitis following surgery.

BACKGROUND: Endophthalmitis is a sight-threatening emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The condition is characterised by purulent inflammation of the intraocular fluids caused by an infective agent. In exogenous endophthalmitis, the infective agent is foreign and typically introduced into the eye through intraocular surgery or open globe trauma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential role of combined pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotics in the acute management of exogenous endophthalmitis, versus the standard of care, defined as vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotics. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 5); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry; ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. There were no restrictions to language or year of publication. The date of the search was 5 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal injection of antibiotics versus intravitreal injection of antibiotics alone, for the immediate management of exogenous endophthalmitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened search results and extracted data. We considered the following outcomes: visual acuity improvement and change in visual acuity at three and six months; additional surgical procedures, including vitrectomy and cataract surgery, at any time during follow-up; quality of life and adverse effects. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.  MAIN RESULTS: We identified a single RCT that met our inclusion criteria. The included RCT enrolled a total of 420 participants with clinical evidence of endophthalmitis, within six weeks of cataract surgery or secondary intraocular lens implantation. Participants were randomly assigned according to a 2 x 2 factorial design to either treatment with vitrectomy (VIT) or vitreous tap biopsy (TAP) and to treatment with or without systemic antibiotics. Twenty-four participants did not have a final follow-up: 12 died, five withdrew consent to be followed up, and seven were not willing to return for the visit.  The study did not report visual acuity according to the review's predefined outcomes. At three months, 41% of all participants achieved 20/40 or better visual acuity and 69% had 20/100 or better acuity. The study authors reported that there was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity between treatment groups (very low-certainty evidence). There was low-certainty evidence of a similar requirement for additional surgical procedures (risk ratio RR 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.21). Adverse effects included: VIT group: dislocated intraocular lens (n = 2), macular infarction (n = 1). TAP group: expulsive haemorrhage (n = 1). Quality of life and mean change in visual acuity were not reported.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified a single RCT (published 27 years ago) for the role of early vitrectomy in exogenous endophthalmitis, which suggests that there may be no difference between groups (VIT vs TAP) for visual acuity at three or nine months' follow-up.   We are of the opinion that there is a clear need for more randomised studies comparing the role of primary vitrectomy in exogenous endophthalmitis. Moreover, since the original RCT study, there have been incremental changes in the surgical techniques with which vitrectomy is performed. Such advances are likely to influence the outcome of early vitrectomy in exogenous endophthalmitis.